David Icke Exposes The Secret Truth of What Happens to Missing Children
Another point not mentioned in this article is that missing children and missing pets will be a major excuse to usher in microchipping the population. I was just told of someone in Europe reporting that she couldn’t buy gas at a gas station because she didn’t have a chip in her card. Microchipping ID cards and microchipping people is already becoming a way to control freedoms.
To read the rest of this article and David Icke’s full article archive subscribe to the David Icke Newsletter
Hello all …
I have a crew from Belgian national television coming to see me on Monday to talk about the global trafficking of children. This is especially significant in Belgium after the child kidnappings and murders in the mid-1990s that threatened to implicate the country’s political establishment and other famous names.
How they got away with it and pinned it all on a sick and pathetic paedophile and child-supplier called Marc Dutroux was the classic establishment response to danger that is repeated constantly across the world.
Often I hear people say that if child abuse, kidnap and murder was happening on the scale I suggest then ‘they’ would not be able to keep it under wraps. What happened in Belgium shows that they can.
As I have said so many times, people generally don’t get their views and opinions from researched information, but from an ‘image’, an ‘impression’, of how things are. With regard to missing children, this ‘impression’ is heavily influenced by the number of lost children stories they see in the media.
If we are talking the national media there are very few. The enormous coverage of the missing British girl, Madeleine McCann, who was abducted while on holiday in Portugal, is a rare example compared with the number of children who disappear every year.
While people get their impression of scale from the lost children featured in the media, staggering numbers of children go missing never to be seen again. I remember calling many American states a few years ago to ask for their missing children figures and it was truly extraordinary. On average, around 3,000 children a day are reported missing in the United States, never mind those the authorities never hear about. Add them together and you are talking hundreds of thousands of children.
Belgium is a small country of some ten million people and yet in the Brussels region alone it was revealed that 1,300 minors disappeared between 1991 and 1996. Around the world you find the same repeating story and multi-millions of children go missing every year never to be found.
Where do they go?
After researching this subject in multiple countries for the best part of 20 years, I can tell you what happens to many of them. They become sex objects for the rich and famous; they are trafficked around the world by rings connected to the rich and famous; and they are sacrificed in the satanic rituals of the rich and famous. Others are enslaved into government and military mind-control programmes which abduct children to genetic order.
This is covered up by controlling the system at all levels: government; law ‘enforcement’; social services; the courts; and the media.
To read the rest of this article and David Icke’s full article archive subscribe to the David Icke Newsletter
Filed under: Civil Liberties and Social Justice, Democracy, Esoterica, From Freedom to Fascism, History, Mind Control, New World Order, Politics, RFID, Scandals, Secret | Tagged: conspiracy, elite, global elite, illuminati, kidnap, missing children, paedophile, satanic ritual
Dossier of Depravity
Nov 28 2006 By The Evening Chronicle
Grim revelations today lift the lid on the shocking scale of sex abuse at a former North East Borstal.
It was meant to give young offenders a short, sharp shock. Instead, many were left scarred for life, haunted by a brutal catalogue of sex attacks.
The abuse of inmates at the Medomsley Detention Centre, in Consett, County Durham, came to light when former kitchen officer Neville Husband was convicted of molesting a string of young lads in the 1970s and 1980s.
But today, fresh revelations expose the shocking scale of the abuse suffered behind the bars of the now-closed juvenile jail.
Secret papers obtained by the Chronicle state that prison officers suspected married father-of-one Husband was preying on inmates but did nothing.
Documents hidden for nearly 40 years reveal Husband, who went on to become a church minister in Gateshead, had been investigated for importing child pornography a decade before he staged his attacks.
Statements by ex-colleagues tell how the 69-year-old, currently serving a 10-year jail term, had regular shipments of hardcore porn sent to him at Medomsley.
And a second officer was also convicted of indecently assaulting a male prisoner, who had been introduced to him by Husband, of Shotley Bridge.
The pair continued to visit and abuse the same boy after he was released from custody.
Transcripts of police interviews also reveal thousands of indecent pictures of children were found on computers seized from Husband’s home and his United Reformed Church office.
Medomsley Detention Centre was built in 1898 but wasn’t acquired by the Prison Commission until 1959.
Employing just 11 staff, a 1977 inspection report described Medomsley as `Dickensian’ and read: “The detention centre has never hit the headlines and within the Prison Department has apparently been accepted as a place where nothing of any import ever occurs and one which is unlikely to cause any problems.”
Husband, now dubbed the `Medomsley monster’, worked at the jail as a kitchen officer. After 27 years in the prison service, he became a United Reformed Church minister in Gateshead in 1994.
But it was not until 2001 that his perverted past came back to haunt him. Previously silenced by shame, some of his victims spoke out about the ordeal they suffered decades earlier.
Husband was convicted by a Newcastle Crown Court jury of molesting five boys and jailed for eight years. Publicity surrounding the trial encouraged others to come forward and he was jailed for a further two years on additional charges.
But now we can reveal Husband’s depraved interest in young boys was apparent years earlier.
A report reveals police probed Husband for importing homosexual pornographic pictures while working at a borstal in Dorset.
The document, signed by the governor of HM Borstal Portland, reads: “The police showed me sample photographs of men in obscene and lewd postures, a signed order form and a signed cheque for 20/- which they allege was sent to an address in Sweden by Officer Husband.
“The police interviewed Officer Husband at Portland police station and he admitted sending for a series of photographs, the sample of the series he ordered pictured two naked men, apparently engaged in homosexual activity.
Immediately following the police interview Husband saw me privately and informed me of the statement he had made to the police.
He told me - and the police - that he was considering writing a book on homosexuality and he had sent for the photos to assist to this end. Officer Husband is a good cook and baker, a married man with one child, buff, hearty and something of a comedian.”
A second document dated July 1967 reveals no further action was taken by the police and Husband was allowed to continue working with children in the prison service.
The allegations made against him in 1967 were brought up again when he was quizzed regarding sex abuse claims in 2001. We have accessed a transcript of a police interview with Husband, during which he admits the pornography he imported showed images of children.
An officer from Consett police station asks him: “And I understand that while you were in Portland, an investigation took place regarding you importing pornographic pictures of teenage boys, is that correct?”
Husband replies: “There was, yes there was.” Seconds later, Husband, who claimed he was writing a book about homosexuality, adds: “The pornography at that time was, it was soft porn, but again I wasn’t aware that it was boys because you got sent what you got sent.”
The deputy governor at Portland while Husband was investigated, James Millar Reid, went on to become the governor at Medomsley.
Statements given to police by prison officers who worked with Husband suggest suspicions were rife about his cravings for young boys, who he went on to molest in the kitchens he ran.
One by an officer who served at Medomsley in 1978, reads: “I don’t know why but all the governors thought very highly of Husband and seemed to look after him.
“For example, on a regular basis on rotation we would thoroughly search various areas within the centre. This was to look for cigarettes and alcohol. All main areas of the prison were searched except for the kitchen area. The prison management would not allow anyone but Husband to have access to the kitchen area.”
After Husband left Medomsley, a search of the kitchen quarters discovered sex toys, pornography and rubber underwear in a filing cabinet. Victims’ statements, many of which are too distressing for us to print, detail how Husband abused them in the kitchen area.
The officer’s statement adds: “There were always very strong rumours that Neville Husband was homosexual and that he was sexually abusing boys who were working with him in the kitchen. This was general knowledge among staff and boys in the centre.
“On a night time Husband would usually keep one boy back with him after the others had been dismissed and we all felt sorry for that boy.
Nobody reported their suspicions to anyone because Husband was so close to, and seemed to be supported by the governors and senior management.” Another officer told how he had to take time off work because of Husband’s “overbearing attitude” and that he was “too scared” to report rumours of him abusing boys.
Our dossier also reveals Husband arranged for pornography to be sent to him. A statement given to police by one of his ex-colleagues reads: “For some time I was employed as a gate officer and was surprised to see Husband was receiving large quantities of post containing homosexual pornography.
“Sometime the envelopes were not sealed and I used to look at the magazines and burn them without telling Husband. One package contained a video. I looked at this and found it was hardcore gay porn, again I burned it.”
A number of former Medomsley workers have told how Husband’s closest friend in the jail was a storeman called Leslie Johnston who has also been convicted of indecent assault on an inmate at the detention centre. He revealed this while being interviewed by police in the run-up to Husband’s trial.
It states: “After a while, Neville and I became quite good friends. We had a mutual interest in religion.” He adds: “We joined the freemasons at Chopwell and got on quite well together. We sometimes went out together with our wives to social functions.”
Johnston’s statement went on: “At one stage I think Neville suggested that he had a lad working in the kitchen who he thought would be suitable to assist me in the stores department. Whilst XXXX was working with me in the stores I developed a sexual relationship with him.” He adds: “As a result of this I was convicted at court of indecent assault and subsequently left the prison service.”
In the same statement, Johnston tells how he knew Husband had abused the same boy and that the pair both visited the victim once he had been released from prison.
Husband was interviewed by police on a number of occasions. The transcript of one quiz, seen by us, tell how explicit videos of children were taken from his house in 1999.
In September 2001, he was arrested on suspicion of possessing indecent photographs of children.
His home PC, disks, zip-disks and a laptop from the United Reformed Church office on Cromer Avenue, Gateshead, had all been seized.
During the interview, Husband is told detectives discovered thousands of indecent images of children, some of which were stored on disks labelled with phoney titles relating to church business.
The Home Office declines to comment on our investigation. No-one at the United Reformed Church was available for comment.
Victims of preacher
Victims of Neville Husband today told of their horror at the revelations about his past.
Kevin Young, of Jarrow, South Tyneside, suffered at the hands of Husband when he was sent to Medomsley for handling a stolen watch in 1977.
Mr Young, now 45, was brutally targeted by Husband, including being photographed while he lay bound, blindfold, and naked.
He said: “When I left that place I was shocked and shaken but I’m even more shocked and shaken at what has come out now.
“These papers show officers saying things like `I felt sorry for that boy’, but I don’t think sorry is good enough.”
The true horror of the ordeal Mr Young suffered didn’t hit him until he had a chance encounter with Husband in York in 1996.
He bravely spoke out against the pervert preacher and after watching Husband get jailed for the attacks, he launched a bid for compensation against the Home Office.
Despite winning a landmark legal victory allowing him to sue last November, the ruling was overturned earlier this month, meaning he will go without a penny.
Now, dad-of-one Mr Young is calling for a full public inquiry into the case.
Mr Young added: “The judge in November described this as a `serious case involving crown officers’ and that’s what it was.
“The truth of the matter is I should never have been subjected to the attacks I was subjected to in light of what was known about him in 1967 in that he had an unhealthy interest in young boys.”
Mr Young is urging any other victims to contact his support group Justice4Survivors.
Another former inmate Richard Hall has also waived his right to anonymity to talk to the Chronicle.
Mr Hall, now 43, of Heaton, Newcastle, was sexually abused and beaten senseless by Husband in 1980.
Today, he said: “It never goes away but it’s right these things come out because people need to know.
“It seems from these papers that there are some people who might have suspected what was going on all along, which leaves a nasty taste to say the least.
“It’s the other victims who perhaps haven’t come forward I worry about.”
Thanks for your comment Kevin. There isn’t enough that can be said about this under the radar travesty.
I was an inmate there,I knew Husband and Johnston, Johnston attempted to, lets say, ‘get to know me better’, I declined and he never tried again.
Husband I never knew about,I only met him a few times.
Inmates at Medomsley were abused everyday, not sexually (to my knowledge) but certainly physically, beatings were given for the slightest of reasons and officers looked the other way if they were not actively taking part in it.The majority of officers viewed the young inmates as their personal punchbags and they had ways of meting out a beating without marks showing.If they did mark an inmate they told any visiting relatives that visits for that inmate were cancelled,visiting rights would then be restored once the marks had disappeared.
There were no innocent parties amongst the officers and governor at Medomsley, they all played their part, they were cowards and bullies and they relished being so.
Even the chaplain would point out any inmate that ‘annoyed’ him knowing full well that that inmate would then get a beating.
I once saw an inmate with a badly swollen black eye receive another one from an officer because when asked who had done it had replied that he had fallen down the stairs.After receiving the second black eye for ‘telling lies’ another officer appeared and having been told the story turned to his fellow officer and informed that it was he that gave the first black eye.They laughed their heads off.
Cowards and bullies.
Wow. I’m sorry to hear that you experienced that Bob. Thanks for commenting to let others know about it.
once again the north east of england is so corrupt so deep with abusers in council in prison in all areas will we ever get to the truth.i myself have been campaining for well over 22 years for justice and the truth into why persons let abuse of children occure and the simalartys beteewn jersey and witherwack house childrens home an d others not surprising .the next one is the isle of white of which david is aware off.
Thanks for your comment Brian.
Emailed to Members of Parliament
I was a victim of sexual abuse at the hands of Neville Husband at the Medomsley Detention centre in Co Durham in the Northeast of England.
I was promoted again to write you all Members of Parliament Not feeling sanguine about the chances that some Members of Parliament will even take the time to read this as a number of emails and documents have been sent to every MP in this country and only one person had the decency to write back to say how sorry he was that these things happened to you and I wish you well with your campaign.
This MP is and has always been a consistent liberal.
The overall majority of returned emails were auto responders or emails not from the MP but their secretaries which for one thing breaches the data protection act as the addressee does not necessarily read the email and the mail is private and of a highly confidential nature and should indeed be read by the intended recipient only! Nevertheless that is the position. At this point I wish to say that the parliamentary restriction is nothing more then a way to cover things up.
My Parliament, in my country should be available to anyone in the country and all should be responsible for stamping out institutional child abuse. It is the direct responsibility of those elected into the highest positions of respect in this country to make sure that when a victim is writing to them that they do not treat it like the ramblings of a lunatic or dismiss it as “He’s not my constituent so he’s not my problem.” What happens if it is a MP who is the abuser?
Who do his/her victims go to tell when almost every MP in this country turns their back on the victims whom are trying to tell them of the abuses that they have had to endure and further injustice of those in power at the home office dragging these victims through year and sometimes decades of litigation while knowing the full incontrovertible facts and truth of these cases.
Many are in fact so close the current unfolding case at Les Chenes, (now known as Greenfields) the secure children’s home and school based on the island of Jersey, we are now hearing for the second time about the institutional child abuse that has been going on there. In 2002, British childcare expert Dr Kathy Bull produced a report which was given confidential access by the BBC. It was in the wake of her findings that Les Chenes was re-named.
More to the point we are hearing about a cover-up within their Parliament where the health minister has been fired by those who would rather protect the interests of Jersey in the international world of finance then look after the Island’s children or help them in times of great stress and pressure to and past the point of criminality,
I would also like to bet that their parliamentary protocols are exactly the same as the UK. It is time for the doors of parliament to swing in both directions as one way traffic will always tell the story one way and either fail to see another way out or blinker themselves away from the truth in the hope that these abhorrent crimes will not tarnish their reputations or stop the flow of cash coming to them.
Two professionals in positions of service to society were sacked for speaking out, although this is of course denied by their employers. One was Jersey’s former minister for Health and Social Security, Senator Stuart Syvret, and the other a social worker. Simon Bellwood, this British social worker confessed, “What concerned me most was that it was quite clear that the system was able to go on without a single senior manager or inspector picking up that the system was abusive to children.”
How many more times do we have to hear this?
If your job is to care for youngsters, and you are sacked because you notice that children are being abused on your watch, the choice is very clear. You keep quiet and keep your job. You speak out, and are sacked.
It was exactly the same at Medomsley, in Consett Co Durham. Almost every member of staff knew exactly what was going on but did nothing to help the young boys in their care. Kevin Young has just come from the House of Lords after winning the right to sue the Home Office for the abuses he and others at the centre suffered. This is because those who ran the centre at the time didn’t care to stop it even though they knew exactly what was going on. They had found copious amounts of substantiating evidence to back up their testimony, but proceeded to destroy it.
It is terrifying when you are not able to tell someone about the abuse you endure, and imagine what it’s like when even the ones you tell either do nothing out of fear for losing their jobs, or victimise you even more for speaking out. You are ensnared by the very authorities that are meant to guide and protect you.
Those who were in the highest positions of power back then may have been replaced, nevertheless that does not make them less culpable or negate their responsibilities to the many victims that this country has produced. Most of these victims derived from the care system, and many went on into various penal institutions or were homeless and or drug addicts with deep psychological wounds that could and should not be bourn alone.
In the news this week, the remains of a child were discovered under the floor at a former care home in Haut de la Garenne in Jersey, and are believed to date from the early 1980s. It’s unlikely the police would have gone looking for bodies without having identified and listened to the 140 victims and 40 suspects that have either come forward or given interviews.
Perhaps we can put to bed the idea that child abuse was not really heard about in the 60’s and 70’s. If that was so, the powers that be were hardly going to be listening to victims coming forward from the 40’s and 50’s. By its very nature, when evidence and testimonies of child abuse occur, they are denied and customarily destroyed.
Those who knew what was going on were deeply entrenched in their behaviour of denial, and we flatter ourselves in thinking things have changed in modern times. The sackings listed above occurred after the millennium, and the abuse deniers still left in employment are still receiving wages from those institutions. In the Medomsley case in particular, there were Masons from the local Masonic lodge involved. There was a sub-structure of social interaction, expectation and control that has never been rigourously addressed. As well as those in high office being members, it is said that the Masons contain many police officers, judges, clergymen and doctors.
Society has already awakened to the fact that it is common for child abusers to hold positions of high office. The reality is that child sexual abuse is as old as the human race itself, and those who claim that they have never heard of it in any decade you care to mention are either lying, or standing upon the foundation of an education that erased any common sense they ever had.
We won’t be fooled any more. In Jersey, there is now an opportunity for the lies of the past to be exposed so that the slate can be wiped clean. It’s either that, or the world will be subject to dribs and drabs of ‘new revelations of child abuse’ for every decade of our children’s lifetimes until there is sufficient collective determination to face up to child suffering, and stop it for good.
The Young v the Diocese of Leeds Catholic church and one other, the one other is the Home Office and the abuse was in a Detention Centre for Boys near Consett County Durham, the abusers were many! The abuse was physical, mental and sexual all at the same time everyday for 17 years.
The Home Office are considering their position, after the landmark ruling in the House of Lords where Lord Hoffmann, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Baroness Hale of Richmond, Lord Creswell and Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood unanimously shared the same opinion in favour of the victims of what after all were in the words of Judge Cockroft, Who was the Judge at Leeds who originally read the case files and used his discretion in the correct manner saying “This is a serious matter concerning Crown Officers.” I feel it would be unjust not to allow this case to go to trial?
At this point the Home Office immediately appealed judge Cockroft’s decision and forced the case to go to the high courts at the strand.
We then at this point were very weary men who were already suffering catastrophic psychological problems manifesting in panic attacks nightmares deep depression hopelessness and a deeper mistrust of the very authority who put us in Medomsley
These were the same authority now dragging the victims through years of litigation and trauma when all this time they were fully aware that what we were telling them and what we wanted to tell the court was nothing but the truth.
Collectively our group have had two of what we would say from bitter experience, the most predatory and consistently prolific pederasts who have ever been heard of as this country and that statement is being very generous. The abuse was relentless for 17 years whilst the abuser was the chief at the now “technically” closed centre. As we all no it’s none other than the privately run Hassockfield secure unit where Adam Rickwood was found hanging in his cell.
We can only wait to see whether justice is finally done and seen do be done. The noble lords are listened to at long last. The statute laws originally brought about to deal with Medical Malfeasance for 30 years has been stopping many legitimate claims by using this dysfunctional law to manipulate and control the leakage of so called historic cases of sexual abuse on 30 years of mainly already vulnerable youngsters
In the same way we believe they have done in the care systems institutions throughout the 50’s 60’s 70’s and 80’s.
Every time it is mentioned or rears its ugly head so called professional dive for cover and I mean that in the literal sense. And in almost every high profile case where the high profile doesn’t get its name from the number of victims involved it is in fact because the pederasts and paedophiles or generally high profile members of our communities, except that the highest tend to put great distance between themselves and those below them, who invariably get the blame for the worst of the abuses.
Some of the crimes committed by these lads pale into insignificance when held up against the mind blowing barrage of crimes perpetrated by those who were meant to guide and teach us the errors of our ways. Many of the victims had fully accepted that they were being punished for the wrongs that they had done.
We now await the Home Office and what they have to say on the matter. All five Labour Home Secretaries since Labour came to power know about this case and have been given the opportunity to stop this charade form continuing knowing full well that the law commission had already made specific recommendation in 2002 to effect the current statute of limitations in much the same way as the noble lords advocated on Wednesday 30 January 2008.
Where they changed 400 years of legal statute law that governed the guiding principles of Parliament in the way that they considered, Parliament had originally intended those principles to be interpreted.
Great insightful comment. Thank you for taking the time to share.
Our government is still coverng up abuse that happened in childrens homes, There was a documentary down about one care home and a government minister called sir george young could have stopped the abuse but chose not too, This was when mrs thatcher was prime minister. Drug abuse of young girls was common place,
Michael, thanks for mentioning this. If you come across a link to the documentary please let us know.
Kendall House in Gravesend Kent severely abused up to 2000 girls. Phisically, mentally, sexually abused and drugs given by force and in doses that will shock most and in a way the church of england and government do not wish you to know about out. This was not drugging children to shut them up. The government and church knew what was going on and in 1980 a documentry was done to expose the abuse at kendall house and the government and church done all they could to hush it up so you didnt get to know about it instead of dealing with it. They left the abuse to continue behind closed doors for 6 further years until its closure and some girls commited suicide and many lives have been ruined. We didnt have anywhere we could run too because no one wanted to know and our social workers knew and refused to deal with it and let it continue. Girls were severely abused, locked up in tiny rooms for months on end with drugs that left them unconcious and abused. Some girls were subjected to ECT as well as drugged and we didnt have mental health problems and many staff (six at a time) would hold the girls down and even get other girls to help hold the terrified girl down whilst they abused them phisically, mentally and with drugs. I had to write my book called Pin Down that came out last year and the paperback due out in may (not associated to the pin down enquiery) to expose what went on behind those closed doors for the first time since that 1980 documentry. The police refuse to investigate the crimes and have treated us like dirt and it is a shame i had to write a book just to be heard and expose the severe abuse and to let everyone know what they didnt want you to know. I have all the evidence too and included some of it in my book. Where is justice? Those who are in positions of trust who blatantly ignored abuse or covered it up should be treated the same as the abusers because they are also to blame for severity of abuse because they allowed it to continue.
Teresa please give us a link to your book. Thanks for taking the time to share what you know. I’ve learned more about this topic from you and the others who have commented on David Icke’s article.
Hi
My link is http://www.no2abuse.com and the hardback is on the home page and links to amazon uk where theres currently 18 reviews. The paperback due out in may will be renamed Trust no one as people were confusing Pin Down with the Pin Down enquiery. On the home page of my site there is a sample chapter of whats in the book.
The documentry in 1980 was done by LWT. Sir George Young was in that documentry.
Sir George Young and other MP’s knew and they opted not to deal with it despite people urging them too deal with it and they were fully aware of the abuse and the drug misuse. Ms Gross from the church of England refused an investigation into Kendall house which was owned by the Church of England in 1980 too and described the girls as very disturbed little girls who needed drugging which of course was untrue as we didnt need drugging let alone being made into the walking dead and severely abused. Dr MS Perinpanayagam admitted to also using CHEMO on the girls as stated in a newspaper article in 1980. Not only did we not have mental health issues or illness, we didnt have cancer either. The church of England have totally mishandled the situation and I went and met the Bishop of Rochester the end of last year and it was 3 of them (all men) against me and they denied it was their responsibility even though they owned Kendall House and knew the abuse was going on at the time. They have refused us an appology. That goes against what the Arch Bishop said last year about historic abuse and how the church would deal with historic abuse. The foster father who raped me several times, he we was allowed to continue as a foster parent as they all covered up what he done and he went on to abuse a young adult with learning disabilities and was convicted of it. I wonder how the parents and the victim would feel if they knew it could of been prevented. Its a catalogue of failures and the care system is the most abusive system you will find and children put in care come out more damaged than they went into care.
If you ignore abuse knowing it is abuse then you are as guilty as the abusers because you dont have to take part in abuse to be part of it and those who stand by and do nothing need to realise that and stop ignoring what goes on in front of their eyes.
The government does not listen and I emailed politely my local MP Eric Pickles who has not once replied to any of my emails or phone calls and his secretary said it was not important enough to warrant a phone call from him, Tony Blair never replied, nor did David Cameron and nor has Gordon Brown. I wonder why.
I would like to see the stats on the percentages of people who came out of their homes to attend this meeting of people who actually care about the children involved in the horrific events now known to have happened on their island.
Like if you compared the 3% of Jerseys population to that of Great Britain 3% that would be bigger then the 2 ,000,000 who went to march against an illegal war.
Thanks for your comment. Maybe one of our readers has information on the stats of the percentages.
SENIOR JERSEY ISLAND MASONS
John Ellis. Former senator (Member of the States of Jersey) and President of the States defence committee, responsible for police.
Frank Amy. Constable for Grouville parish. The position as head of the parish’s honorary police, is an elected member of the States of Jersey, the islands parliament.
John Farley. Former deputy for St Helier (Deputies are also members of the States of Jersey.
Don Filleul. Waterfront Enterprise Board Chairman, former president of the then States public works committee.
Edwin Godel. Constable for St. Mary parish.
Colin Goss. Contenier for St Peter parish. Conteniers, elected by parish assemblies, are operational heads of honorary police with exclusive powers of arrest.
Carl Hinault. Constable for St. John parish, former president of the States planning and environmental committee.
Reg Jeune OBE. President of the States policy and resources committee(Jersey’s “prime minister”
until 1996. Former Lloyds TSB Group director and TSB Channel Islands chairman.
Stanley Le Cornu. Constable for St. Clement parish, former deputy for St Clement.
Michael Payne. Aide-de-camp to Lieutenant-Governor ( Queens representative) of Jersey 1990-95. Former Hill Samuel Bank(Jersey)company director.
Edward Potter. Jurat of the Royal Court.
Brian Richardson. Former constable for Trinity Parish.
Leonard Gower-Ross. Former chairman of Ross Gower Ltd, a London based insurance company with offices in Jersey and Guernsey.
David Rothband. Former Contenier for St Helier parish.
David Seal. Founder and former managing director of Jefferson Seal stockbrokers. Also, a director of Stannifer Hotels Group.
Derek Seymour. A former director of the Seymour Hotels Group, which owns several hotels in Jersey.
Peter Stoneman. Senior manager at UBS private banking subsidiary Cantrade when it was embroiled in a currency-dealing fraud.
Charges against him were discontinued in 1997.
Alfred Vibert. Former jurat of the Royal Court and honorary police officer.
Richard Wade OBE. Former Managing Director of Jersey Electricity.
Peter Walsh. Former Chamber of Commerce president, standing for election as senator in October 1999.
[img]http://www.justice4survivors.org/blogpictures/burry_ingyou_head.gif[/img]
I am aware of how this said market works right here in the United States as the East Coast of this Country has a Major Child Trafficing ring going on. I tried to stop them but after my friend got shot and killed, (which was not on the Police Report), my efforts were pushed back. Now, in order for the Government to cover up the truth to which I am aware of, the Law Enforcement has, with no evidence to conclude or suppoert any of their claims, has labeled me…
It is the courageous effort of those like you and your friend, that will expose what is really happening in this world. The hidden agenda is being exposed more and more to the extent that soon they ewill not be able to proceed with their plans.
It is time for VINDICATORS to arise all over the world and put down the network of Evil doers. Show no mercy to those who have shown no mercy.
Amen.