Why 75% of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy on Themselves

Since this post has generated a lot of comments and traffic, I’m adding a solution to the post rather than just posting about the problem. For information on natural solutions to cancer please visit Dr. Lorraine Day’s website and be sure to read the information on her Questions and Anwers page. Dr. Day cured herself of cancer using natural therapies and she is a medical professional. Also see my post on Questioning Chemotherapy.

From Cancer Therapy:

The great lack of trust is evident even amongst doctors. Polls and questionnaires show that three doctors out of four (75 per cent) would refuse any chemotherapy because of its ineffectiveness against the disease and its devastating effects on the entire human organism.

This is what many doctors and scientists have to say about chemotherapy:“The majority of the cancer patients in this country die because of chemotherapy, which does not cure breast, colon or lung cancer. This has been documented for over a decade and nevertheless doctors still utilize chemotherapy to fight these tumors.” (Allen Levin, MD, UCSF, “The Healing of Cancer”, Marcus Books, 1990).

“If I were to contract cancer, I would never turn to a certain standard for the therapy of this disease. Cancer patients who stay away from these centers have some chance to make it.” (Prof. Gorge Mathe, “Scientific Medicine Stymied”, Medicines Nouvelles, Paris, 1989)

Dr. Hardin Jones, lecturer at the University of California, after having analyzed for many decades statistics on cancer survival, has come to this conclusion: ‘… when not treated, the patients do not get worse or they even get better’. The unsettling conclusions of Dr. Jones have never been refuted”. (Walter Last, “The Ecologist”, Vol. 28, no. 2, March-April 1998)

“Many oncologists recommend chemotherapy for almost any type of cancer, with a faith that is unshaken by the almost constant failures”.(Albert Braverman, MD, “Medical Oncology in the 90s”, Lancet, 1991, Vol. 337, p. 901)

“Our most efficacious regimens are loaded with risks, side effects and practical problems; and after all the patients we have treated have paid the toll, only a miniscule percentage of them is paid off with an ephemeral period of tumoral regression and generally a partial one” (Edward G. Griffin “World Without Cancer”, American Media Publications, 1996)

“After all, and for the overwhelming majority of the cases, there is no proof whatsoever that chemotherapy prolongs survival expectations. And this is the great lie about this therapy, that there is a correlation between the reduction of cancer and the extension of the life of the patient”. (Philip Day, “Cancer: Why we’re still dying to know the truth”, Credence Publications, 2000)

“Several full-time scientists at the McGill Cancer Center sent to 118 doctors, all experts on lung cancer, a questionnaire to determine the level of trust they had in the therapies they were applying; they were asked to imagine that they themselves had contracted the disease and which of the six current experimental therapies they would choose. 79 doctors answered, 64 of them said that they would not consent to undergo any treatment containing cis-platinum – one of the common chemotherapy drugs they used – while 58 out of 79 believed that all the experimental therapies above were not accepted because of the ineffectiveness and the elevated level of toxicity of chemotherapy.” (Philip Day, “Cancer: Why we’re still dying to know the truth”, Credence Publications, 2000)

“Doctor Ulrich Able, a German epidemiologist of the Heidelberg Mannheim Tumor Clinic, has exhaustively analyzed and reviewed all the main studies and clinical experiments ever performed on chemotherapy …. Able discovered that the comprehensive world rate of positive outcomes because of chemotherapy was frightening, because, simply, nowhere was scientific evidence available demonstrating that chemotherapy is able to ‘prolong in any appreciable way the life of patients affected by the most common type of organ cancer.’

Able highlights that rarely can chemotherapy improve the quality of life, and he describes it as a scientific squalor while maintaining that at least 80 per cent of chemotherapy administered in the world is worthless. Even if there is no scientific proof whatsoever that chemotherapy works, neither doctors nor patients are prepared to give it up (Lancet, Aug. 10, 1991). None of the main media has ever mentioned this exhaustive study: it has been completely buried” (Tim O’Shea, “Chemotherapy – An Unproven Procedure”)

“According to medical associations, the notorious and dangerous side effects of drugs have become the fourth main cause of death after infarction, cancer, and apoplexy” ( Journal of the American Medical Association, April 15, 1998)

From Cancer Inform:

“Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy.”
-Dr. Alan Levin

A six- or twelve-month course of chemotherapy not only is a very unpleasant experience but also has its own intrinsic mortality…treatments now avert…perhaps 2 or 3 percent…of the 400,000 deaths from cancer that occur each year in the U.S.”
– Prof John Cairns

Scientific American, 1985

Chemotherapy Report
Do We Need a New Approach to Cancer?


In 1971, President Richard Nixon announced the War on Cancer and promised a cure by the 1977 bicentennial. In each of the 25 years since, more Americans have died of cancer than the year before.
The failure of chemotherapy to control cancer has become apparent even to the oncology establishment. Scientific American featured a recent cover story entitled: “The War on Cancer — It’s Being Lost.” In it, eminent epidemiologist John C. Bailar III, MD, PhD, Chairman of the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at McGill University cited the relentless increase in cancer deaths in the face of growing use of toxic chemotherapy. He concluded that scientists must look in new directions if they are ever to make progress against this unremitting killer.

Adding its voice, the prestigious British medical journal The Lancet, decrying the failure of conventional therapy to stop the rise in breast cancer deaths, noted the discrepancy between public perception and reality. “If one were to believe all the media hype, the triumphalism of the [medical] profession in published research, and the almost weekly miracle breakthroughs trumpeted by the cancer charities, one might be surprised that women are dying at all from this cancer” it observed. Noting that conventional therapies — chemotherapy, radiation and surgery — had been pushed to their limits with dismal results, the editorial called on researchers to “challenge dogma and redirect research efforts along more fruitful lines.”

John Cairns, professor of microbiology at Harvard University, published a devastating 1985 critique in Scientific American. “Aside from certain rare cancers, it is not possible to detect any sudden changes in the death rates for any of the major cancers that could be credited to chemotherapy. Whether any of the common cancers can be cured by chemotherapy has yet to be established.”

In fact, chemotherapy is curative in very few cancers — testicular, Hodgkin’s, choriocarcinoma, childhood leukemia. In most common solid tumors — lung, colon, breast, etc. — chemotherapy is NOT curative.

In an article entitled “Chemotherapy: Snake-Oil Remedy?” that appeared in The Los Angeles Times of January 9, 1987, Dr. Martin F. Shapiro explained that while “some oncologists inform their patients of the lack of evidence that treatments work…others may well be misled by scientific papers that express unwarranted optimism about chemotherapy. Still others respond to an economic incentive. Physicians can earn much more money running active chemotherapy practices than they can providing solace and relief…to dying patients and their families.”

Dr. Shapiro is hardly alone. Alan C. Nixon, PhD, Past President of the American Chemical Society wrote that “As a chemist trained to interpret data, it is incomprehensible to me that physicians can ignore the clear evidence that chemotherapy does much, much more harm than good.”

In 1986, McGill Cancer Center scientists sent a questionnaire to 118 doctors who treated non-small-cell lung cancer. More than three quarters of them recruited patients and carried out trials of toxic drugs for lung cancer. They were asked to imagine that they themselves had cancer, and were asked which of six current trials they themselves would choose. Of the 79 respondents, 64 said they would not consent to be in a trial containing cisplatin, a common chemotherapy drug. Fifty-eight found all the trials unacceptable. Their reasons? The ineffectiveness of chemotherapy and its unacceptable degree of toxicity.

Famed German biostatistician Ulrich Abel, PhD, also found in a similar 1989 study that “the personal views of many oncologists seem to be in striking contrast to communications intended for the public.”

Breast cancer activist Rose Kushner wrote that by 1981 “indiscriminate, automatic adjuvant chemotherapy was replacing the Halsted radical mastectomy as therapeutic overkill in the United States.” Thomas Nealon, MD, Professor of Surgery at New York University School of Medicine, concluded in 1990 that “The treatment of this tumor now has slipped from too much surgery to too much adjuvant therapy.”

Why so much use of chemotherapy if it does so little good? Well for one thing, drug companies provide huge economic incentives. In 1990, $3.53 billion was spent on chemotherapy. By 1994 that figure had more than doubled to $7.51 billion. This relentless increase in chemotherapy use was accompanied by a relentless increase in cancer deaths.

Oncologist Albert Braverman, MD, wrote in 1991 that “no disseminated neoplasm (cancer) incurable in 1975 is curable today…Many medical oncologists recommend chemotherapy for virtually any tumor, with a hopefulness undiscouraged by almost invariable failure.”

Why the growth in chemotherapy in the face of such failure? A look at the financial interrelationships between a large cancer center such as Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and the companies that make billions selling chemotherapy drugs is revealing. James Robinson III, Chairman of the MSKCC Board of Overseers and Managers, is a director of Bristol-Myers Squibb, the world’s largest producer of chemotherapy drugs. Richard Gelb, Vice-Chairman of the MSKCC board is Chairman of the Board at Bristol-Myers. Richard Furlaud, another MSKCC board member, recently retired as Bristol Myers’ president. Paul Marks, MD, MSKCC’s President and CEO, is a director of Pfizer.

Advertisements

42 Responses

  1. Thank you for this information! This amazes me. It is hard to comprehend the lack of change for the better in the medical community.

  2. This is just a huge bunch of quotes used out of context. There are many types and indications of chemotherapy, some of which are desperate attempts that rarely yield results, while some others have success and save lives every day.

    Treatment of neoplasia must be discussed one drug or drug combination at a time, one type of tumor at a time. Bashing away at chemotherapy at large – without giving any sign that you’ve actually studied the subject apart from quoting others’ conclusions – is so sophistic, it actually makes you sound like an ignorant. Is your opinion based on cheap fast-built belief and hearsay, or do you have some experience in healthcare ?

    • Hi! I ingested chemo for 9 months for stage 3 brain cancer and the cancer returned within 18 months. We need to treat cancer as an inside enemy not an outside enemy. I am a 10 year survivor and I am alive because I have always been my own best doctor. I would never take chemo again or give it to anybody I love. Cytotoxic treatments are just not the answer. Even if the cancer is placed in remission, often the patient suffers a compromised quality of life. Ps I got rid of my cancer by by balancing my body with proper mineral supplementation on a cellular level. Prayer and a positive outlook helps too blessings to all!!

  3. LOL, wow the naivety of people who listen to doctors on the internet.

  4. The quotes do seem to lack the context necessary to prove your claims. As someone a bit cautious of the medical establishment, I do think much has been left out to the detriment of your argument.

  5. If only I could remember where I read it- but somewhere it is written that if a cancer patient could survive the chemo- they would have survived the cancer.

  6. shut up and just give to cancer…phillistine’s

    • We all have cancer cells however for many people they over ride our ability to destroy them. Is it logical to think that giving sick people large amounts of toxic substances will return them to health? It further reduces their health; if a container of these chemicals is dropped it’s a bio-hazard!

      Any thinking person would logically believe the best approach is to restore the bodies abilities to fight these cells through good nutrition versus feeding them poison. Is that too simple to be true?

      I sincerely feel for the vast number of people living with this condition and I fully understand their desire to take advice from MD’s however ND’s can also provide sound advice to support good health.

      Healing must be approached from many paths and the quality of the patient’s present life must be considered.

  7. the toxic chemo used to treat my son is what took his life not the cancer cause he beat it.the cancer he had was;t even in a stage it was easliy removed it was locialized and hadn;t spread anywhere else , i don;t know why there was a need for such toxic chemo sense it could have just been removed and watched ,then my son would still be with me today.

    • I am so sorry about the loss of your son. I was diadnosed this past june with a very aggressive breast cancer and declined chemo and radiation, much to their disbelief. I did have the tumor removed. Five weeks after the surgery I lost my daughter, my youngest. I can feel the pain of all parents that have lost a child. It has only been 5 months. I miss her so much. Again Ann, I am so sorry. Cindy

  8. Again, this is why i’ve not received any chemo or radiation for my breast cancer. I’ve seen what happens, I decided for myself that I didn’t have to do anything that the doctor “ordered”. I did my own homework first and I’m very happy that I didn’t choose the regular route that so many take.

    To Ann, I’m very sorry about the loss of your son. What a shame. Truly, I’m so sorry.

    Peace, love and understanding to all.

    ~ RubyShooZ ~

  9. Great information… I would reject chemo as well! More people need to be in tune with natural remedies and stop the commercial brainwash by big pharma.

    Rolly

  10. Follow the money.
    The word Pharmacia means sorcery/witchcraft in the Greek.

    http://www.tpranch.wordpress.com

  11. This article is insulting to cancer patients who have been helped through chemotherapy treatments. If it were up to these studies I would have either a) died or b) gone into later stages of acromegaly then died. All options for cancer treatment have side effects, some leave 12 inch scars across your head and other make you vomit during treatment. To say that chemo does more harm than good is simply misinformed.

  12. the chemo my son was on destroyed the connective tissue;s in his heart ,i know it is said that the benefits outway the risk ,but what benefits did my son recieve, there lack of keeping and eye on his heart caused ireprable damage that took his life.we was not given an option of what treatments were to be used we were told this is what has to be done.what happened to our son we were told happens to 1 in a million it ;s one of the less common side effects,well i lost my only child to these toxcins,and i believe to hear the fact of this happening from someone its happened to rather than someone taking your money is something i have to do.i have to do this for my son .

  13. There are always people who behind every disease, behind every travesty of nature, see a sinister conspiracy, in this case that of mainstream doctors, the FDA, and the pharmaceutical companies which, if merely exposed, would deliver us from all evil. Of course, truth is more complicated. The best advice is to beware of simplistic answers, especially those that attribute malicious motives to a whole swath of humanity.

  14. I don’t know much about chemo, but it has been presented to my father as an only hope. He is on his 10th treatment right now. He will be getting a bone marrow transplant soon, but it is being seen as a last effort. My family and I have been grasping at prayers for a year now. Hoping that he will get thru this, but we see him deteriorate everyday and it is heart breaking…
    But, to see an article like this… saying that my father essentially has no hope what-so-ever. It’s devistating. My father is 46 and he has no hope? He’s gone thru the treatments for nothing… But all you have is quotes. Are there no hard facts nor evidence to present to us? Some of us are relying on the gamble that chemo will somehow save our families, our loved ones. It’s a hard thing to deal with on the day to day. So please, either get some facts and present them or be more respectful of the struggle that people like my father go thru on a daily basis.

    Respectfully,
    Mae

    Hopelessness is too easy to find, don’t make it even easier.

  15. Dr. Day looks suspicious to me. She criticizes the cancer “industry” but of course she won’t reveal her cures unless you buy her DVD

  16. […] pretty ludicrous statements online regarding cancer treatment. For example, in one blog post titled “Why %75 of doctors would refuse chemotherapy on themselves” the author states “Polls and questionnaires show that three doctors out of four (75 per cent) […]

  17. yea chemo is bad for body mind soul
    but you have written a completely biased essay
    you provide only that which supports your argument
    in order to *persuade* the many rather than just guide gullible people with no power of discernment, you must provide counter-evidence and show how, despite all counter evidence, chemo is still bad.
    chemo cures people from cancer.
    chemo also fails to cure people from cancer.
    argue both points with sincerity, leaving aside your biases, then reveal the true message – that there are better cures for cancer than chemo. but this too requires evidence.
    thanks for the article, may you write a less biased essay next time around.
    love
    nick

  18. Eric this is amazing and more of what the world needs to hear!!!!

    Transferring myself from the conventional science field and going into the holistic and natural field, I can totally vouch for this.

    I would never get chemo and it is so sad that so many cancer patients believe it is their only hope.

    The most important thing to understand is that cancer is mostly a LIFESTYLE disease and numerous cases and scientists have proven that when you change that lifestyle, the cancer goes away.

    Good for you for voicing this!

  19. I thought I also read somewhere that only 3% survive chemo. I thought this was bogus until I worked in a clinic and saw for myself. Not one patient that year even made it. So if you know someone who did survive years after chemo I am sure they fall into that 3% or you would have survived it even without chemo. This is just my personal observation.

  20. I was diagnosed with cancer just under 2 years ago and the doctors told me I would die if I did not get chemotherapy.

    I refused chemo, undertook the alternative treatment and now my cancer has dissapeared.

    If anyone wanted to check out my story or learn what I did just click on my name.

    • Can you tell me what type of alternative treatment you took and what type of cancer you had? I’m trying to find out what has worked for people. Thanks.

  21. Other alternatives are “Vibe Machine” Quantum Flux or whatever it’s been renamed (based on lots of electro-medical principles)

    or the Royal Raymond Rife machines, equally electro-medicine.

    Or ongoing regimens of B17/Laetrile. Let the disinfo begin, though worth saying what works that has been politically ousted by the military medical mafia complex.

    A good book: read Health Wars by Philip Day.

  22. Several clients are/were pharmaceutical representatives . Interesting anecdotes re how the pharmaceutical industry promotes the latest elixer du jour (drug) by bonus incentives to reps & physicians ( free trips , entertainment , kickbacks ?) on a biweekly basis. Candidly they acknowledge that most physicians (clients) have very limited knowledge of Pharmacology & dispense only what the reps promote. The average repertoire of these physicians is around 20 different prescriptions. My wife just discovered she has stage 4 ovarian cancer. Her own cousin is head of a womens oncological hospital in one of Canada’s major cities. He is the first to state (privately) that doctors medical training centers on treating the symptoms ( tumor) rather than the cause . Nutrition & alternative holistic remedies are paid only lip service , if considered at all.

  23. […] pretty ludicrous statements online regarding cancer treatment. For example, in one blog post titled “Why %75 of doctors would refuse chemotherapy on themselves” the author states “Polls and questionnaires show that three doctors out of four (75 per cent) […]

  24. This is stupid. I have testicular cancer and was cured by chemotherapy. testicular cacner has aover a 90% cure rate now thanks to chemotherapy. Look it up if you dont believe me.
    I do agree however that you should do your research and see if chemo is effective for the type of cancer you have

  25. Chemo may seem to work for some,but its clearly hit and miss,because it is a non-selective cellular poison,which means it can destroy healthy non-cancerous cells too.Even when it does work,the cost to the body is high,because of its toxicity to cells and major organs.Not to mention the fact that chemo greatly suppresses immune system function.Somebody with cancer needs a full-functioning immune system.I would never take chemo(or radiation)and would discourage anyone I cared about from using it too.

  26. I have my real experience of systems’ (police-brutality-abuse) case. just wanted you to know that I was a healthy and energetic person and my friends/fans/media call me little Bruce Lee; never had to go to doctor, but now I have to take Neurontin, Morphine, and etc for Police misconduct (favoritism)
    since white house nor Eric holder or anyone else protects me, I had to tell my story as follow:

    Please help me out against corrupted “Police!”-Brutality -case that Led me to get kidnapped by them on 11/07/09 Case #: 09-94496, Modesto Ca and the Reason; then I found out that it was based on “Favoritism!” I was taking out of my complex apartment into a secluded parking lot whole handcuffed, one cops literally had his foot on my face with whole his Weight, and then they started Beating me up to death with their boots; I cracked my entire spines, all the way to the neck; I have Sever narrowing from C2 to C6, and I had been Played Down by so called “Family Doctor, Mr. Wenstrups’ Associate” that I Just have too many Complex cases and “they Don’t Know How to Treat Me!” tilted spine in the midst of my back spine, torn muscle on my right shoulder, torn tendons on my right knee, dislocated right foot toe, and damaged right hand thumb; and still my wounds are in the process of healing!

    Then on 12/03/09 (police report 09-101738) I was involved in an staged accident by Modesto police department; since as soon as cops appeared, in the matter of a Seconds, 2 ambulances arrived, then despite the fact that I told them I don’t want to go to hospital, the E.R personnel insisted and they Have to transport me in Memorial Hospital, where I was held for 12 hours without water nor food and when I objected, they told me that I am going to have an “Open Heart Surgery” by doctor Azadi. I am trying to reach Attorney General Mr. Eric Holder in order to have these serious “Police Brutality/Abuse” to be resolved and make them pay for what they have done to me and what they intended to do to me for wanting to have my “Heart” taken out!!! But, my attorneys from Bay area Still can’t get the Police Report!!! It was Just for the Alcoholic lady whom after her mother passed away became Homeless, and I let her live with me, Got Drunk and I had enough and told her Just leave the hell away from me and suddenly from my anger, I just brook the glass in the bath room, which was extremely wrong on my part. Then I just got out, and had to calm myself down, for me dropping a ball that brook the glass. But I million years I could Not ever think that she (An Alcoholic who was/is Always Drunk, and My neighbors, Church bodies, Friends and Family Knew/Know her extreme problems; and when I was told by Pastor Mark Krieger that I need to Let her Hit the Bottom, where my response was “Didn’t Jesus say that God will leave 99 sheaps and Goes after the Only Last “LOST SHEEP”) Would call cops on Me, and claiming that I am going to kill her and such, while I had one year “Restraining Order” against her, and My mother had “Five” years restraining” order against Her as well. But these Cops just Love to Serve Ladies with Passion without even asking me anything else except my Name!!!! Well she is White and I am Originally From Iran, when George Bush marked Iran on the Axes of Evil, while Plotting their Murderous Game with Just 2 Saudis who Had their Orders and were paid to Just Fly those towers and still Studies are U.S allies and Iran name whose Government Was Supported and are in Charge for CIA’s Help to tackle Shah of Iran and Bring Barbarians in Power! Thanks for Being Such a Great & Positive Role Model. All that Matters Now is to Digest the “Bitter Truth” that Our Mother Earth Calls/Needs OUR HELP. It is Not Fair to Let these Bastards/Murderess to Kill and Distroy ALL, and Sell their Under Ground Bases for 50k, for smaller place and 100k for bigger place, where Every one can LIVE UP TO “One Year” Do we really have to Let all of this Beauty, Wealth, Water, Food, Mountains and Everything in it, With Everyone on this Planet to Be Destroyed and Get Us All Murdered and Convince Us to buy a place “MADE BY UNITED STATE MILITRY” to Just Live under Ground, If any One can Offered to Pay that kind of Money!!!!?. WAKE UP WORD!!!!!! This Earth Can Feed and Support million time More than present population on earth (near 7 billion), if they Distribute Mother Natures Free Wealth to Everyone! We Must Not Let them to Hire the Most Wanted Murderers with different IDs and Big Pays in order to Just “Follow Orders” and “KILLLLL” Since they Already Proved how they Commit what is Expected From them!!! They Got their “A+” for Being Ignorant of Any ones Life! This is Our Calling!!!! Please Wake Up and Listen to This Brave Heart Person and people like me; ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!! It Must Ring The “BELL!” That they are going to Nuke the Earth, and by then it would Be to Late to See Who, How, OR? AND Why They Did it. Don’t Let them Get Away with this, and Let them Flee/Escape to Multi-Trillion Dollars Space Stations, where they Would Live as Aliens (U.F.Os). Life is Not all about Alcohol, Sex, Drugs AND/OR JOB Anymore!!! We Will/Are Blessed With Everything With Need on Earth, Let’s Put an End to this Trauma, We can Be all Turn to Be Good People; But Now the Mother Earth Needs Our Help, We Must Give Her a Second Chance in order to Survive, Otherwise, We All are Doomed by Heartless Politicians, leaders of conspiracy, hypocrisy, Corruptions and Murderess… Nothing is impossible, FREE Our Earth From these Wicked People! We Need Our Safe Life, Our Future and Family to Have a Normal Life; Lets’ Restore the Order and Let them Know that their Pyramid is Going to Crash, No more Abusive/Slavery-System Of All Nations for Few Assassins/Terrorists Who Now Want to Destroy Earth as Well as All Nations!!!!

    I Just Need Justice! WE JUST NEED TO LIVE AS FREE PEOPLE! Not Slaves of the Murderous and Corrupted SYSTEM! I am all the Way with YOU My Friend/Brother! I Have you in my Positive Vibes and Support in Everything that YOU have Said; & if Every Word can Play or Be Like a “SPIRIT”, Then All YOUR Words and Mine MUST BE HEARD & Touched and Sensed By the “MOTHER NATURE” and We All WILL PREVAIL INJUSTICE. They started they True Color by Murdering Innocent People on September eleven: THE TIME IS NOW For us to Stand Up and Become a Family of “Positive One” against the Family of “Negative One”

    Peace and Love,
    Edward

  27. This is very interesting. I was just wondering why doctors still recommend chemotherapy when they themselves doesn’t believe that it is the best way to treat cancer. If this is true isn’t it a bit of hypocrite of them to provide this treatment any further? This is quite confusing. What are other treatments that can be taken then? Are there any better treatments than chemotherapy? I would really love to know because I knew someone who is going to be treated with chemotherapy colon. It worries me a lot because I know this will be a difficult experience. Please enlighten me with this. Thank you very much!

  28. Interesting.

  29. My husband age 79 has stage 3 lung cancer,after one dreadful treatment of chemo, he decided to look for an alternative cure ,well he found one on the internet its called the Budwig cancer cure,a Doctor in Germany came up with it. It consists of ridding your body of all toxins by changing your diet.A big part of the diet is Pure Flax Oil and cottage cheese mixed together.all the info is on your computer.We are delighted with the results.It is now seven months since he was diagnosed and his health is better than any senior person that i know.He has fantastic energy , and is eating all before him .We thank the Lord for giving us common sense to choose the right treatment.The doctors only gave him a 10% chance of a cure ,the Budwig plan gives over a 90% cure rate.
    we do believe Chemo and Radiation are the biggest scams ever perpetrated on cancer patients.We chose quality of life over quantity and it sure looks like we got both.Thanks be to the lord ,good luck every one and God bless.J & E

  30. As a patient I do find all this very thought provoking but I would like to see some more up to date quotes – without being an expert it’s difficult to know how relevant comments are when they were made in the 80s and 90s and treatments are changing all the time.

    • Kate,
      Everything is worse now. The entire pharmaceutical industry is replete with adverse drug reactions which results in many deaths. Over 100,000 deaths annually in the USA result from adverse drug reactions. Many of these deaths occur in the chemo world. Since the 80’s and 90’s the drug industry has gone ballistic, so the problem is much worse now than it was then.

  31. Reblogged this on tenr0 and commented:
    Interesting….

  32. […] ineffectiveness of chemotherapy and its unacceptable degree of toxicity.” Also check out this link for the low-down on chemo and radiation […]

  33. […] ineffectiveness of chemotherapy and its unacceptable degree of toxicity.” Also check out this link for the low-down on chemo and radiation […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: