97% of climate scientists…

A very quick breakdown of the lies, sophistry & misrepresentation surrounding the almost ubiquitous 97% ‘climate consensus’ claim.

** This is pretty old now, but I’ve moved it here so that I can reference it **

I’ve quickly broken down the the details of what is and is not demonstrated in skepticalscience.com’s representation of the level of endorsement found among peer reviewed papers, of the belief that global warming is being primarily driven by man – along with what skepticalscience.com explicitly and implicitly claims that the paper demonstrates, and how trusted sources cite the paper as proof of something which it either makes no claim to prove, or incorrectly (dishonestly?) misrepresents.

This is the primary source among Nasa’s referenced sources here:


“Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities.”

I’ll be ignoring the absurdity of consensus driven ‘science’ for the time being. There is no need to argue the science denial of such a position when the consensus claim is a clear fabrication to begin with.

via 97% of climate scientists… | Minds


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: