The Survival of Billy Best Proves Cancer Doctors Wrong about Daniel Hauser

By Mike Adams

If there’s one thing that cancer doctors and health authorities can’t stand, it’s being wrong. And in the case of 13-year-old Daniel Hauser, the cancer doctors insist that unless the boy submits to chemotherapy as a “treatment” for Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, he will almost certainly die.

But there’s a problem with that claim. The problem is a man named Billy Best, now 31 years old, who was diagnosed with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma at the age of 16. Like Daniel Hauser, Billy Best was told he would die if he didn’t submit to chemotherapy. But with remarkable courage and wisdom about his own body’s healing capabilities, Billy Best fled the health authorities, ran away from his family and began eating roots, superfoods and medicinal herbs. He regularly drank an alternative cancer liquid formula (made from plants) and before long his cancer was cured.

Billy, of course, is alive and well today… fifteen years after his cancer doctors said he should be dead.

More here

Nurse blogs on dangers of prescription drugs, vaccines and more

Read Olivia Love Worthy Tzfat’s Blog Here

As a nurse I am shattering the myth of modern medicine.

Medical protocol is determined by what’s most profitable, which means “managing” diseases with medication rather than curing them. This way people stay sick, and keep spending money to get well.

Since graduating with honors in 1990 from one of the top 10 nursing schools in the US, I have learned the inside truth about Western medicine – a truth that most doctors and nurses are totally unaware of.

Like myself they chose their profession with good intentions, believing it was valiant, but this is a powerful deception hiding a villainous truth.

A sample of topics I write on includes prescription drugs (ineffective and deadly), vaccines (also ineffective and deadly), fluoride (a chemical weapon found in many prescription drugs and added to tap water), chemotherapy (another chemical weapon), and chemtrails. I also discuss what we can do to safely regain optimal health.

Drug companies “fund” medical schools with millions of dollars annually in exchange for their loyalty, and therefore medical students are taught only to prescribe drugs and never learn that nutrition cures chronic diseases.

Drug companies also advertise heavily in medical journals and make up a good portion of their editorial boards, controlling what doctors read throughout their careers. Therefore most doctors are completely unaware that safe, natural and cost effective cures for their patients even exist (click here for an example involving a successful cancer cure). Although many people are waking up to the fact that drug companies are suppressing natural cures and seeking to destroy many forms of natural healing, most are unaware that Western medicine was developed by Wall Street bankers and over 1,300 of Hitler’s top Nazi scientists who were brought to the US in the 1940’s.

Nazis Didn’t Lose The War, They Just Had To Move” (Mark Phillips, former CIA operative). Modern medicine is a tool of the Global Elite, also known as the Illuminati – a small group of men who are determined to decrease the population in order to gain world domination. The medical field is one of their most powerful tools and thus far has claimed many lives. For example,

Chemotherapy has been proven ineffective in 96-98% of all cancers yet is widely prescribed, kills patients faster than their cancer would have, and was derived from mustard gas which was used to kill during World War I.

Ask any doctor how many patients they have who lived more than 5 years after receiving chemo and their answer won’t be too encouraging, yet statistics from the American Cancer Society falsely claim that cancer has a 50% cure rate. This is because the American Cancer Society, an organization that suppresses natural cancer cures in order to sustain itself, eliminates all patients who die during treatment from their numbers, making their cancer survival statistics completely false. This clearly eliminates the true danger of chemotherapy from their pamphlets.

Another example is that vaccines have been proven by the drug companies’ own research not to induce immunity and contain some of the strongest poisons known to mankind, such as mercury, aluminum and formaldehyde. Vaccines are a multi-billion dollar annual fraud pushed by the “World Health Organization” despite the growing number of children who develop autism after receiving them, in addition to a large number of adults who develop debilitating illnesses after being vaccinated.
Vaccines are commonly contaminated with cancer viruses and other pathogens. Yet another example is that many people have successfully cured their diabetes using natural means, yet patients are not told this is even possible in mainstream medicine, and doctors are largely unaware.

You aren’t hearing about these things in the news because the mass media is corporately owned by the same elitists who are pulling the strings behind the world stage, determining elections, propagandas and policies.

They seek to keep the masses in the dark . If something is offensive to a corporate sponsor, such as a drug company, it doesn’t make the news. Just look at how many drugs are advertised during the evening news, and you’ll see who’s paying for – in other words, controlling – the programming.

As the minds of the masses are distracted and lulled into submission through the media, the body is under intentional assault from poisonous chemicals in the food, water, air and prescription drugs.

The people – or “sheeple” – have complacently placed their health into the hands of a corrupt industry. All of this has come about so gradually that it is accepted as “normal,” but it is the result of calculated brainwashing carried out through the media, which daily professes the “miracles of modern medicine” while suppressing the truth.

There are those who use faith as an excuse to tolerate evil (“Well, it’s God’s will so just let it happen”), and then there are those who use it as a reason to resist evil. It’s my belief that even though everything comes from above and all things happen for a reason, I still have a personal responsibility to warn my neighbor in the face of danger.

To me, this is loving my neighbor as myself. What he chooses to do with the information is up to him. You can take the blue pill and go back to sleep, or you can take the red pill and Open Your Eyes.

Click here for my YouTube channel.

Questioning Chemotherapy

A few days ago I posted Why 75% of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy on Themselves. This post has generated a lot of interest. My only intent in posting the article was to give airtime to the information on chemotherapy that is generally ignored, such as how the people on the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Board also work for and profit from Bristol-Myers Squibb, the largest producer of chemotherapy drugs.

We live in an over-medicated world where people are given disinformation, at the peril of human health, to increase pharmaceutical profits. This may or may not be one of those cases. Either way, it’s worth researching. This post contains more information to help those looking for answers.

From Shirleys-Wellness-Cafe.com:

Questioning Chemotherapy

An Australian study suggests that the benefits of chemotherapy have been oversold … Why has it been oversold? Are you suggesting that medical oncologists in Australia are just sort of marketing shysters or what?’ These were some of the questions posed by Dr Norman Swan when he presented the Health Report on ABC Radio National on 18 April 2005. Dr Swan was quizzing Associate Professor Graeme Morgan, the lead author of a controversial article entitled ‘The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies’. This article reported that chemotherapy has improved survival by less than 3% in adults with cancer. more

In 1987 Dr. Lana Levi, of the University of California wrote, “Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy… It does not eliminate breast, colon, or lung cancer. This fact has been know for over a decade. Women with breast cancer are likely to die faster with chemotherapy than without it.”

Questioning Chemotherapy: A Critique of the Toxic Drugs Used in Chemotherapy
by Ralph W. Moss Ph.D.

Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D. – “Conventional cancer therapy is so toxic and dehumanizing that I fear it far more than I fear death from cancer. We know that conventional therapy doesn’t work–if it did, you would not fear cancer any more than you fear pneumonia. It is the utter lack of certainty as to the outcome of conventional treatment that virtually screams for more freedom of choice in the area of cancer therapy. Yet most alternative therapies regardless of potential or proven benefit, are outlawed, which forces patients to submit to the failures that we know don’t work, because there’s no other choice. I started as a believer in chemotherapy. As a science writer at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, I wrote articles praising the latest advances in chemotherapy. Because chemotherapy drugs were general cellular poisons, they could be terribly toxic. They were also very expensive for patients and for society as a whole. When I learned about the links between the pharmaceutical industry and the cancer establishment (later detailed in my book, The Cancer Industry) I understood the commercial reason that such an inadequate modality was so heavily promoted.”

Dr. Hardin Jones, professor of medical physics and physiology at the University of California, Berkeley. He told an ACS panel, “My studies have proven conclusively that untreated cancer victims actually live up to four times longer than treated individuals. For a typical type of cancer, people who refused treatment lived for an average of 12-1/2 years. Those who accepted surgery other kinds of treatment lived an average of only three years. . . . I attribute this to the traumatic effect of surgery on the body’s natural defense mechanism. The body has a natural defense against every type of cancer.” G. Borell, The Peroxide Story (Delano, Minnesota: ECHO, 1988), page 30. – Dr. Hardin Jones is a professor of medical physics and physiology at the University of California, Berkeley.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) says that the powerful drugs used in chemotherapy can themselves cause cancer and pose a risk to nurses, pharmacists and others who handle them. A housekeeper who dumps the contents of a bedpan into a toilet might not realize that the waste is toxic. “Sometimes, 80 percent of the active ingredient [in a drug] goes right through the patient’s system,” said Borwegen, who also served on the NIOSH work group. More – What if the Cure is Also a Cause?

William Campbell Douglass II, MD – “To understand the utter hypocrisy of chemotherapy, consider the following: The McGill Cancer Center in Canada, one of the largest and most prestigious cancer treatment centers in the world, did a study of oncologists to determine how they would respond to a diagnosis of cancer. On the confidential questionnaire, 58 out of 64 doctors said that all chemotherapy programs were unacceptable to them and their family members.

The overriding reason for this decision was that the drugs are ineffective and have an unacceptable degree of toxicity. These are the same doctors who will tell you that their chemotherapy treatments will shrink your tumor and prolong your life! Thirty years ago, I worked with a radiologist who told me this: “If I get cancer, I’m going to Mexico.” So if you get cancer, don’t call your doctor; call your travel agent. There are alternative treatments available, but you will have to run the gamut of outraged chemotherapists, radiologists, and surgeons to find one. They will use cajolery, insults, fear, threats (“If you do this, I am off the case”), and misrepresentation to dissuade you.”

Chemotherapy: Afraid of Their Own Medicine In one survey, most oncologists specializing in lung cancer reported that they would not take chemotherapy if they had the disease. Yet, everyday these doctors give their patients chemotherapy. In conversation with an investigative reporter, one brain cancer specialist admitted that he would never submit to radiation if he had a brain tumor. Nevertheless, he continues to send patients for radiation, because he would be kicked out of the hospital if he didn’t follow the accepted protocol. Based on information in: Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients, Jan 1998; Spectrum, Mar/April 1998

In her book, ‘Managing the Side Effects of Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy‘, Marylin J.Dodd, RN, PhD, describes side effects associated with radiation therapy. Dr. Dodd has 25 years of research experience helping patients and their families manage the side effects of cancer treatment. She is a professor of nursing at the University of California, San Francisco School of Nursing.

Scientists in China have also shown that a spirulina extract increased the level of white cells in the blood and of nucleated cells and DNA in the bone marrow of mice that had been subjected to chemotherapy and radiation. In dogs, the spirulina extract additionally increased the level of red blood cells. The authors concluded that spirulina “has chemo-protective and radio-protective capability, and may be a potential adjunct to cancer therapy.” CancerDecisions

Death by Doctoring The burning and scarring is the result of a spill of chemotherapy onto the bare hand. Is it any wonder that people are worried about what might be happening to their insides as chemotherapy is intravenously fed into the body? Is it any wonder that chemotherapy nurses wear protective gloves? And is it any wonder that so high a percentage of oncologists refuse to submit to the treatments they advocate for their patients? Hazel had every right to be concerned about the internal damage taking place as she was being intravenously administered chemotherapy for her breast cancer. moreDeath by Doctoring

Overcoming Immunosuppression from Chemotherapy Overcoming Chemotherapy Sickness with Nutritional Supplements

Cancer patients who are undergoing chemotherapy or radiation which greatly weaken the immune system, can greatly benefit from taking transfer factor supplementation. Transfer factor supplementation serves to protect the body from “opportunistic” infections, which often occur during these treatments. Dr Duane Townsend, former director of gynecologic oncology at LDS Hospital in Salt Lake City, puts all of his cancer patients on transfer factor treatments to boost their immune systems’ abilities to respond to any health challenges. Both Japanese and Chinese clinical studies found that the immunosuppression that results from chemotherapy can be prevented by using transfer factor isolates. Keep in mind that the elimination of dying or dead cancer cells is monitored by the immune system. Italian, Japanese and American studies tell us that the use of transfer factor isolates to boost immune function after surgery significantly improves the chances of cancer-free future. More about Transfer Factor

Scientists in China have also shown that a spirulina extract increased the level of white cells in the blood and of nucleated cells and DNA in the bone marrow of mice that had been subjected to chemotherapy and radiation. In dogs, the spirulina extract additionally increased the level of red blood cells. The authors concluded that spirulina “has chemo-protective and radio-protective capability, and may be a potential adjunct to cancer therapy.” CancerDecisions

Why 75% of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy on Themselves

Since this post has generated a lot of comments and traffic, I’m adding a solution to the post rather than just posting about the problem. For information on natural solutions to cancer please visit Dr. Lorraine Day’s website and be sure to read the information on her Questions and Anwers page. Dr. Day cured herself of cancer using natural therapies and she is a medical professional. Also see my post on Questioning Chemotherapy.

From Cancer Therapy:

The great lack of trust is evident even amongst doctors. Polls and questionnaires show that three doctors out of four (75 per cent) would refuse any chemotherapy because of its ineffectiveness against the disease and its devastating effects on the entire human organism.

This is what many doctors and scientists have to say about chemotherapy:“The majority of the cancer patients in this country die because of chemotherapy, which does not cure breast, colon or lung cancer. This has been documented for over a decade and nevertheless doctors still utilize chemotherapy to fight these tumors.” (Allen Levin, MD, UCSF, “The Healing of Cancer”, Marcus Books, 1990).

“If I were to contract cancer, I would never turn to a certain standard for the therapy of this disease. Cancer patients who stay away from these centers have some chance to make it.” (Prof. Gorge Mathe, “Scientific Medicine Stymied”, Medicines Nouvelles, Paris, 1989)

Dr. Hardin Jones, lecturer at the University of California, after having analyzed for many decades statistics on cancer survival, has come to this conclusion: ‘… when not treated, the patients do not get worse or they even get better’. The unsettling conclusions of Dr. Jones have never been refuted”. (Walter Last, “The Ecologist”, Vol. 28, no. 2, March-April 1998)

“Many oncologists recommend chemotherapy for almost any type of cancer, with a faith that is unshaken by the almost constant failures”.(Albert Braverman, MD, “Medical Oncology in the 90s”, Lancet, 1991, Vol. 337, p. 901)

“Our most efficacious regimens are loaded with risks, side effects and practical problems; and after all the patients we have treated have paid the toll, only a miniscule percentage of them is paid off with an ephemeral period of tumoral regression and generally a partial one” (Edward G. Griffin “World Without Cancer”, American Media Publications, 1996)

“After all, and for the overwhelming majority of the cases, there is no proof whatsoever that chemotherapy prolongs survival expectations. And this is the great lie about this therapy, that there is a correlation between the reduction of cancer and the extension of the life of the patient”. (Philip Day, “Cancer: Why we’re still dying to know the truth”, Credence Publications, 2000)

“Several full-time scientists at the McGill Cancer Center sent to 118 doctors, all experts on lung cancer, a questionnaire to determine the level of trust they had in the therapies they were applying; they were asked to imagine that they themselves had contracted the disease and which of the six current experimental therapies they would choose. 79 doctors answered, 64 of them said that they would not consent to undergo any treatment containing cis-platinum – one of the common chemotherapy drugs they used – while 58 out of 79 believed that all the experimental therapies above were not accepted because of the ineffectiveness and the elevated level of toxicity of chemotherapy.” (Philip Day, “Cancer: Why we’re still dying to know the truth”, Credence Publications, 2000)

“Doctor Ulrich Able, a German epidemiologist of the Heidelberg Mannheim Tumor Clinic, has exhaustively analyzed and reviewed all the main studies and clinical experiments ever performed on chemotherapy …. Able discovered that the comprehensive world rate of positive outcomes because of chemotherapy was frightening, because, simply, nowhere was scientific evidence available demonstrating that chemotherapy is able to ‘prolong in any appreciable way the life of patients affected by the most common type of organ cancer.’

Able highlights that rarely can chemotherapy improve the quality of life, and he describes it as a scientific squalor while maintaining that at least 80 per cent of chemotherapy administered in the world is worthless. Even if there is no scientific proof whatsoever that chemotherapy works, neither doctors nor patients are prepared to give it up (Lancet, Aug. 10, 1991). None of the main media has ever mentioned this exhaustive study: it has been completely buried” (Tim O’Shea, “Chemotherapy – An Unproven Procedure”)

“According to medical associations, the notorious and dangerous side effects of drugs have become the fourth main cause of death after infarction, cancer, and apoplexy” ( Journal of the American Medical Association, April 15, 1998)

From Cancer Inform:

“Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy.”
-Dr. Alan Levin

A six- or twelve-month course of chemotherapy not only is a very unpleasant experience but also has its own intrinsic mortality…treatments now avert…perhaps 2 or 3 percent…of the 400,000 deaths from cancer that occur each year in the U.S.”
– Prof John Cairns

Scientific American, 1985

Chemotherapy Report
Do We Need a New Approach to Cancer?


In 1971, President Richard Nixon announced the War on Cancer and promised a cure by the 1977 bicentennial. In each of the 25 years since, more Americans have died of cancer than the year before.
The failure of chemotherapy to control cancer has become apparent even to the oncology establishment. Scientific American featured a recent cover story entitled: “The War on Cancer — It’s Being Lost.” In it, eminent epidemiologist John C. Bailar III, MD, PhD, Chairman of the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at McGill University cited the relentless increase in cancer deaths in the face of growing use of toxic chemotherapy. He concluded that scientists must look in new directions if they are ever to make progress against this unremitting killer.

Adding its voice, the prestigious British medical journal The Lancet, decrying the failure of conventional therapy to stop the rise in breast cancer deaths, noted the discrepancy between public perception and reality. “If one were to believe all the media hype, the triumphalism of the [medical] profession in published research, and the almost weekly miracle breakthroughs trumpeted by the cancer charities, one might be surprised that women are dying at all from this cancer” it observed. Noting that conventional therapies — chemotherapy, radiation and surgery — had been pushed to their limits with dismal results, the editorial called on researchers to “challenge dogma and redirect research efforts along more fruitful lines.”

John Cairns, professor of microbiology at Harvard University, published a devastating 1985 critique in Scientific American. “Aside from certain rare cancers, it is not possible to detect any sudden changes in the death rates for any of the major cancers that could be credited to chemotherapy. Whether any of the common cancers can be cured by chemotherapy has yet to be established.”

In fact, chemotherapy is curative in very few cancers — testicular, Hodgkin’s, choriocarcinoma, childhood leukemia. In most common solid tumors — lung, colon, breast, etc. — chemotherapy is NOT curative.

In an article entitled “Chemotherapy: Snake-Oil Remedy?” that appeared in The Los Angeles Times of January 9, 1987, Dr. Martin F. Shapiro explained that while “some oncologists inform their patients of the lack of evidence that treatments work…others may well be misled by scientific papers that express unwarranted optimism about chemotherapy. Still others respond to an economic incentive. Physicians can earn much more money running active chemotherapy practices than they can providing solace and relief…to dying patients and their families.”

Dr. Shapiro is hardly alone. Alan C. Nixon, PhD, Past President of the American Chemical Society wrote that “As a chemist trained to interpret data, it is incomprehensible to me that physicians can ignore the clear evidence that chemotherapy does much, much more harm than good.”

In 1986, McGill Cancer Center scientists sent a questionnaire to 118 doctors who treated non-small-cell lung cancer. More than three quarters of them recruited patients and carried out trials of toxic drugs for lung cancer. They were asked to imagine that they themselves had cancer, and were asked which of six current trials they themselves would choose. Of the 79 respondents, 64 said they would not consent to be in a trial containing cisplatin, a common chemotherapy drug. Fifty-eight found all the trials unacceptable. Their reasons? The ineffectiveness of chemotherapy and its unacceptable degree of toxicity.

Famed German biostatistician Ulrich Abel, PhD, also found in a similar 1989 study that “the personal views of many oncologists seem to be in striking contrast to communications intended for the public.”

Breast cancer activist Rose Kushner wrote that by 1981 “indiscriminate, automatic adjuvant chemotherapy was replacing the Halsted radical mastectomy as therapeutic overkill in the United States.” Thomas Nealon, MD, Professor of Surgery at New York University School of Medicine, concluded in 1990 that “The treatment of this tumor now has slipped from too much surgery to too much adjuvant therapy.”

Why so much use of chemotherapy if it does so little good? Well for one thing, drug companies provide huge economic incentives. In 1990, $3.53 billion was spent on chemotherapy. By 1994 that figure had more than doubled to $7.51 billion. This relentless increase in chemotherapy use was accompanied by a relentless increase in cancer deaths.

Oncologist Albert Braverman, MD, wrote in 1991 that “no disseminated neoplasm (cancer) incurable in 1975 is curable today…Many medical oncologists recommend chemotherapy for virtually any tumor, with a hopefulness undiscouraged by almost invariable failure.”

Why the growth in chemotherapy in the face of such failure? A look at the financial interrelationships between a large cancer center such as Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and the companies that make billions selling chemotherapy drugs is revealing. James Robinson III, Chairman of the MSKCC Board of Overseers and Managers, is a director of Bristol-Myers Squibb, the world’s largest producer of chemotherapy drugs. Richard Gelb, Vice-Chairman of the MSKCC board is Chairman of the Board at Bristol-Myers. Richard Furlaud, another MSKCC board member, recently retired as Bristol Myers’ president. Paul Marks, MD, MSKCC’s President and CEO, is a director of Pfizer.