Why 75% of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy on Themselves

Since this post has generated a lot of comments and traffic, I’m adding a solution to the post rather than just posting about the problem. For information on natural solutions to cancer please visit Dr. Lorraine Day’s website and be sure to read the information on her Questions and Anwers page. Dr. Day cured herself of cancer using natural therapies and she is a medical professional. Also see my post on Questioning Chemotherapy.

From Cancer Therapy:

The great lack of trust is evident even amongst doctors. Polls and questionnaires show that three doctors out of four (75 per cent) would refuse any chemotherapy because of its ineffectiveness against the disease and its devastating effects on the entire human organism.

This is what many doctors and scientists have to say about chemotherapy:“The majority of the cancer patients in this country die because of chemotherapy, which does not cure breast, colon or lung cancer. This has been documented for over a decade and nevertheless doctors still utilize chemotherapy to fight these tumors.” (Allen Levin, MD, UCSF, “The Healing of Cancer”, Marcus Books, 1990).

“If I were to contract cancer, I would never turn to a certain standard for the therapy of this disease. Cancer patients who stay away from these centers have some chance to make it.” (Prof. Gorge Mathe, “Scientific Medicine Stymied”, Medicines Nouvelles, Paris, 1989)

Dr. Hardin Jones, lecturer at the University of California, after having analyzed for many decades statistics on cancer survival, has come to this conclusion: ‘… when not treated, the patients do not get worse or they even get better’. The unsettling conclusions of Dr. Jones have never been refuted”. (Walter Last, “The Ecologist”, Vol. 28, no. 2, March-April 1998)

“Many oncologists recommend chemotherapy for almost any type of cancer, with a faith that is unshaken by the almost constant failures”.(Albert Braverman, MD, “Medical Oncology in the 90s”, Lancet, 1991, Vol. 337, p. 901)

“Our most efficacious regimens are loaded with risks, side effects and practical problems; and after all the patients we have treated have paid the toll, only a miniscule percentage of them is paid off with an ephemeral period of tumoral regression and generally a partial one” (Edward G. Griffin “World Without Cancer”, American Media Publications, 1996)

“After all, and for the overwhelming majority of the cases, there is no proof whatsoever that chemotherapy prolongs survival expectations. And this is the great lie about this therapy, that there is a correlation between the reduction of cancer and the extension of the life of the patient”. (Philip Day, “Cancer: Why we’re still dying to know the truth”, Credence Publications, 2000)

“Several full-time scientists at the McGill Cancer Center sent to 118 doctors, all experts on lung cancer, a questionnaire to determine the level of trust they had in the therapies they were applying; they were asked to imagine that they themselves had contracted the disease and which of the six current experimental therapies they would choose. 79 doctors answered, 64 of them said that they would not consent to undergo any treatment containing cis-platinum – one of the common chemotherapy drugs they used – while 58 out of 79 believed that all the experimental therapies above were not accepted because of the ineffectiveness and the elevated level of toxicity of chemotherapy.” (Philip Day, “Cancer: Why we’re still dying to know the truth”, Credence Publications, 2000)

“Doctor Ulrich Able, a German epidemiologist of the Heidelberg Mannheim Tumor Clinic, has exhaustively analyzed and reviewed all the main studies and clinical experiments ever performed on chemotherapy …. Able discovered that the comprehensive world rate of positive outcomes because of chemotherapy was frightening, because, simply, nowhere was scientific evidence available demonstrating that chemotherapy is able to ‘prolong in any appreciable way the life of patients affected by the most common type of organ cancer.’

Able highlights that rarely can chemotherapy improve the quality of life, and he describes it as a scientific squalor while maintaining that at least 80 per cent of chemotherapy administered in the world is worthless. Even if there is no scientific proof whatsoever that chemotherapy works, neither doctors nor patients are prepared to give it up (Lancet, Aug. 10, 1991). None of the main media has ever mentioned this exhaustive study: it has been completely buried” (Tim O’Shea, “Chemotherapy – An Unproven Procedure”)

“According to medical associations, the notorious and dangerous side effects of drugs have become the fourth main cause of death after infarction, cancer, and apoplexy” ( Journal of the American Medical Association, April 15, 1998)

From Cancer Inform:

“Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy.”
-Dr. Alan Levin

A six- or twelve-month course of chemotherapy not only is a very unpleasant experience but also has its own intrinsic mortality…treatments now avert…perhaps 2 or 3 percent…of the 400,000 deaths from cancer that occur each year in the U.S.”
– Prof John Cairns

Scientific American, 1985

Chemotherapy Report
Do We Need a New Approach to Cancer?


In 1971, President Richard Nixon announced the War on Cancer and promised a cure by the 1977 bicentennial. In each of the 25 years since, more Americans have died of cancer than the year before.
The failure of chemotherapy to control cancer has become apparent even to the oncology establishment. Scientific American featured a recent cover story entitled: “The War on Cancer — It’s Being Lost.” In it, eminent epidemiologist John C. Bailar III, MD, PhD, Chairman of the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at McGill University cited the relentless increase in cancer deaths in the face of growing use of toxic chemotherapy. He concluded that scientists must look in new directions if they are ever to make progress against this unremitting killer.

Adding its voice, the prestigious British medical journal The Lancet, decrying the failure of conventional therapy to stop the rise in breast cancer deaths, noted the discrepancy between public perception and reality. “If one were to believe all the media hype, the triumphalism of the [medical] profession in published research, and the almost weekly miracle breakthroughs trumpeted by the cancer charities, one might be surprised that women are dying at all from this cancer” it observed. Noting that conventional therapies — chemotherapy, radiation and surgery — had been pushed to their limits with dismal results, the editorial called on researchers to “challenge dogma and redirect research efforts along more fruitful lines.”

John Cairns, professor of microbiology at Harvard University, published a devastating 1985 critique in Scientific American. “Aside from certain rare cancers, it is not possible to detect any sudden changes in the death rates for any of the major cancers that could be credited to chemotherapy. Whether any of the common cancers can be cured by chemotherapy has yet to be established.”

In fact, chemotherapy is curative in very few cancers — testicular, Hodgkin’s, choriocarcinoma, childhood leukemia. In most common solid tumors — lung, colon, breast, etc. — chemotherapy is NOT curative.

In an article entitled “Chemotherapy: Snake-Oil Remedy?” that appeared in The Los Angeles Times of January 9, 1987, Dr. Martin F. Shapiro explained that while “some oncologists inform their patients of the lack of evidence that treatments work…others may well be misled by scientific papers that express unwarranted optimism about chemotherapy. Still others respond to an economic incentive. Physicians can earn much more money running active chemotherapy practices than they can providing solace and relief…to dying patients and their families.”

Dr. Shapiro is hardly alone. Alan C. Nixon, PhD, Past President of the American Chemical Society wrote that “As a chemist trained to interpret data, it is incomprehensible to me that physicians can ignore the clear evidence that chemotherapy does much, much more harm than good.”

In 1986, McGill Cancer Center scientists sent a questionnaire to 118 doctors who treated non-small-cell lung cancer. More than three quarters of them recruited patients and carried out trials of toxic drugs for lung cancer. They were asked to imagine that they themselves had cancer, and were asked which of six current trials they themselves would choose. Of the 79 respondents, 64 said they would not consent to be in a trial containing cisplatin, a common chemotherapy drug. Fifty-eight found all the trials unacceptable. Their reasons? The ineffectiveness of chemotherapy and its unacceptable degree of toxicity.

Famed German biostatistician Ulrich Abel, PhD, also found in a similar 1989 study that “the personal views of many oncologists seem to be in striking contrast to communications intended for the public.”

Breast cancer activist Rose Kushner wrote that by 1981 “indiscriminate, automatic adjuvant chemotherapy was replacing the Halsted radical mastectomy as therapeutic overkill in the United States.” Thomas Nealon, MD, Professor of Surgery at New York University School of Medicine, concluded in 1990 that “The treatment of this tumor now has slipped from too much surgery to too much adjuvant therapy.”

Why so much use of chemotherapy if it does so little good? Well for one thing, drug companies provide huge economic incentives. In 1990, $3.53 billion was spent on chemotherapy. By 1994 that figure had more than doubled to $7.51 billion. This relentless increase in chemotherapy use was accompanied by a relentless increase in cancer deaths.

Oncologist Albert Braverman, MD, wrote in 1991 that “no disseminated neoplasm (cancer) incurable in 1975 is curable today…Many medical oncologists recommend chemotherapy for virtually any tumor, with a hopefulness undiscouraged by almost invariable failure.”

Why the growth in chemotherapy in the face of such failure? A look at the financial interrelationships between a large cancer center such as Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and the companies that make billions selling chemotherapy drugs is revealing. James Robinson III, Chairman of the MSKCC Board of Overseers and Managers, is a director of Bristol-Myers Squibb, the world’s largest producer of chemotherapy drugs. Richard Gelb, Vice-Chairman of the MSKCC board is Chairman of the Board at Bristol-Myers. Richard Furlaud, another MSKCC board member, recently retired as Bristol Myers’ president. Paul Marks, MD, MSKCC’s President and CEO, is a director of Pfizer.

Can You Hear the Health Freedom Debate? Why Not?

 From Heath Freedom:

ASKING THE TOUGH QUESTIONS ON

HEALTH FREEDOM

WHERE DO PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES

STAND?

PLEASE FORWARD AS WIDELY AS POSSIBLE


Health Freedom is a “Participatory Sport”

You’re Up!

Fifteen people (or so) want to be the next President of the United States. Where do they stand on the Health Freedom questions that will protect – or destroy – your access to natural health options?

Let’s Find Out!



The Health Freedom Constituency is growing by leaps and bounds. In the last few days, you have sent an astonishing 293,039 emails to the Texas State Legislature and Texas Medical Board letting them know how deeply concerned we are about their attack on good docs (like Bill Rea) who practice good medicine for their patients! A couple of months ago, more than 588,000 folks decided the FDA needed to hear from them protesting their dangerous CAM guidance.

Can You Hear the Health Freedom Debate?

Why Not?

Have you noticed that our deep concern over Health Freedom issues is not mirrored in the national debate? Only one candidate, Ron Paul, even has a Health Freedom plank in the campaign platform! Where are the rest of the candidates on these vital issues? It’s time to hold the Presidential candidates’ collective feet to the fire and bring our issue, Health Freedom, to the forefront of the national debate during this 2008 Presidential campaign.

Just where do the candidates stand on, for example,

  • Compulsory vaccination
  • Taking children away from parents who do not want them medicated with dangerous or lethal medications
  • Your right to use bio-identical hormones instead of synthetic ones
  • “HARMonizing” with Codex, the European Union and other international bodies and agencies in preference to US regulation and law
  • Enforcing the 1998 Anti-Harmonization law (19 USC 3512) protecting dietary supplements which the FDA is apparently bent on ignoring
  • Retracting the Executive Orders merging the US, Canada and Mexico in the “North American Union” and merging the FDA and its Canadian and Mexican counterparts via the already-operating “Trilateral Cooperation Charter”
  • Divesting the FDA of its food regulation responsibilities since it is allowing the food supply to be irresponsibly and dangerously degraded

If We Don’t Ask, They Won’t Tell

The reality is that if one of us asks the Health Freedom questions, there is little likelihood that we will be heard. But if hundreds of thousands of us reach out to the candidates’ campaign headquarters and roar out our questions, we can bring our concerns into the mainstream spotlight.

We need to create a “Virtual Town Hall Meeting” in which we ask our questions so persistently, and with such a loud collective voice, that either the candidates answer our questions or their lack of response becomes their answer.

As a reader of these Health Freedom Alerts, you are aware of the unprecedented series of attacks on nutrients and natural remedies orchestrated by the FDA and its friends in Congress and international agencies like Codex and the North American Union.

Not only is the FDA attacking wholesome nutrition, it continues to promote unwholesome foods — genetically modified, toxified, irradiated “Franken-food.” And it fails to protect the safety of the food supply while it fails to protect the public from harmful pharmaceutical medications that kill hundreds of thousands a year.

How does the person who may be our next President stand on these vital health care and health freedom issues? Will he — or she — support policies that may protect your health from real threats like dangerous drugs and corporate degradation of your food and environment? If we don’t ask we will never know, until, perhaps, it is too late.

Ready, Set, FAX!

 

Here’s your part:

1. Click here (http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizationsORG/healthfreedomusa/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=13881) to send a fax asking these questions to every Presidential Candidate. Once the answers are in, we will create a Health Freedom Score Card (c) to publicize the results at the national level with press releases, interviews, etc. Maybe we’ll even be able to hold a Health Freedom Presidential Debate! That depends on how vigorous the fax flow is, which takes us to

2. Forward this email to every single person, supplier and contact you know and ask them to do the same. Add something like the following to the top of your email to your list:

” I am forwarding this email to you and asking you to do the same thing -forward it to your entire list- because of the unique opportunity that we have right now to shine the spotlight of public awareness on a hidden danger. Right now, powerful forces are threatening your right to chose natural health options if you want to.

Children are being taken away from parents who do not want them drugged with powerful and dangerous drugs. US laws protecting our health freedoms are ignored by industry friendly regulators giving preference to international agreements that degrade our food and our freedoms.

In this campaign season, only one of the Presidential candidates has taken a positions on safeguarding our health freedoms. All of them will be forced to do so if enough people take a moment to ask a set of critically important Health Freedom questions of them and demand that they answer them.

Please take a moment to read this email and send a fax asking the Health Freedom questions to the Presidential Candidates. Then send this email on to your list to generate the public pressure necessary to reverse the loss of our freedoms.

Thanks for your help! For more information, go to www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and sign up for their free Health Freedom Alerts.

“Freedom Is Not Free”

Never Has Been, Never Will Be

Every fax we send costs us additional money compared to an email. That is why we ask for your tax deductible donations to help us sustain our ability to communicate using whatever means is necessary.

When the FDA shut off email communication on its Health Claims Guidance recently (probably because the Natural Solutions Foundation was so effective in our email campaign on the CAM Guidance right before that one) we had two choices: allow the FDA’s change in email policy to muzzle us or find another way of getting our voices heard. Despite the financial burden to us, we chose to give your voice a way to ring out.

Since Presidential candidates almost all use web forms (which cut down the number of people communicating drastically) instead of email, we cannot use our customary email system to ask them our questions in the hundreds of thousands. But they do have faxes. So we’ll fax them our questions. To do that, however, we need your help: please give as generous a donation as you can to help defray the cost of the health freedom campaign.

Donations of any size are welcome. In order to fund the full length DVD “Murder by the Numbers: the Codex Agenda” any round number donation of $100 or more (e.g., $200, $500, $1000, etc.) will be counted toward the film fund and you will be thanked publicly for your support in the final version of “Murder by the Numbers”! If you would like all of your donation of $100 or more to go to the support of the Natural Solutions Foundation, make sure it is not a round number!

A Final Thought

I received this in an email today and thought it was worth sharing because it asks yet another important Health Freedom question:

The Cycle By Which
Civilizations and Individuals Rise and Fall

-From Bondage comes Spiritual Faith

-From Spiritual Faith comes Courage

-From Courage comes Liberty

-From Liberty comes Abundance

-From Abundance comes Complacency

-From Complacency comes Apathy

-From Apathy comes Dependency

-From Dependency comes Bondage

Now Ask Yourself This Question.

Where, As A Nation, Are WE?

That’s why we ALL need to get involved, ask these questions, and get answers.


Yours in health and freedom,

Dr. Rima


Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org

Pioneering Doctors Attacked for Practicing Good Medicine, Saving Lives – Naturally!

From Health Freedom:

 

Recently I shared with you an atrocious situation in California in which a mother and her 17 year old son are being abused and threatened by the State’s demand that he receive the “standard treatment” for malignant melanoma – surgery and chemotherapy – DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE IS NOW CANCER FREE!

Supply and Demand – Medical

Fascism Style

Economics is about supply and demand. Make no mistake about it: Medical Fascism is about economics. Since the State (in this case, California) believes that it owns your body (or your child’s) it can decide what happens to it over your objections and at your cost and, perhaps, at the cost of your life. In doing so, it is protecting the illness care industry from the threat which the health care presents, and doing so ruthlessly. Nothing new there!

In supply and demand terms, this invasion of your person and your rights is intended to shut down what economists call “the demand side”.

The supply side is under attack, too. Doctors who practice natural medicine are subjected to medical fascism. The Medical Fascists attack the liciense, reputation, resources and skill of the practitioners we trust. And, with the determined help of the US regulatory bodies like the FDA and Codex, they are carefully eliminating the substances and practices you and I seek out for natural treatments.

Case in Point

William (Bill) Rea, MD, is my friend. He is also a brilliant and innovative doctor, a scholar, an exceptional and generous teacher and the undisputed dean of Environmental Medicine. Patients come to his Environmental Health Centers from around the world because they are desperate, dying or distressed.

Using his ever-expanding and truly astonishing knowledge and his gift for fearless, out-of-the-box diagnostic skills, coupled with his vast clinical experience, Bill Rea gives the environmentally ill a chance of being radiantly well. Naturally.

So, naturally, the Texas Medical Board wants to put him out of business. Again. This is not the first time they have attacked him.

This time, on the basis of “three anonymous complaints” involving 5 patients (all of whom are still under Dr. Rea’s care and have written to the Texas Medical Board to say that they are very happy with Dr. Rea’s care and that they are doing very well) the Texas Medical Board wants to take away Dr. Rea’s license to practice medicine.

WHITHER THE CONSTITUTION?

MAKE THAT

“THE WITHERING CONSTITUTION”

Last time I looked, the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States said that we have certain rights which were inalienable, not granted – or taken away – by the Texas Medical Board. These rights include the right to confront our accuser, the right to see the evidence against us and the right to a review by our peers.* Apparently the Texas Medical Board operates, as do most Medical Boards in the US, under a different set of rules.

Based on secret “evidence” provided by an “anonymous accuser” and supported by an anonymous reviewer (not a peer, since he is unfamiliar with Environmental Medicine), the Texas Medical Board is trying to control the supply side of natural medicine. Dr. Rea’s patients have written to the Board saying that they are not only happy with his care, they are still being treated by him and, in two cases, credit Dr. Rea with saving their lives. I have been in Dr. Rea’s clinic to learn Environmental Medicine from him and to watch a master healer at work. I know that many of his patients are, in fact, alive today because of his superb skills. And, indeed, that is exactly the point. These people have stepped outside the drug based treatment box and Dr. Rea has helped them to do it. Therefore, Dr. Rea is a danger to the drug industry and, more importantly, to the entire illness care industry. Whether he is also a danger to an underlying design of phamaceutally-assisted genocide is another question.

The last time I raised this issue, our website was instantly attacked. Let’s see if it happens again! Clearly the game of the illness-care industry is to make sure that as many people as possible are dependant upon it for as long as possible. That’s where the contamination and degradation of food through Codex and US government regulatory actions comes in: healthy people are awful patients for the illness-care industry.

Follow the Money

But part of the picture, too, is to make sure that people in need of care, or trying to avoid needing care, have no options except those of drugs, radiation and surgery to meet their health needs. Doctors like Bill Rea, and the other great docs under attack around the US, and healers who are not doctors but are being attacked for “practicing medicine without a license” are being driven off the supply side of the street by these organized and vicious attacks. We, as health consumers and health freedom advocates, MUST NOT let that happen.

Click here (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php/?p=416) to read Dr. Rea’s letter to his patients. And then, whether you live in Texas or not, click here (http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizationsORG/healthfreedomusa/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=13538) to tell the Texas Medical Board and the Texas Legislators that you support health freedom, and the right to consult with – or BE – a good doctor.

Natural Health Rights

No matter where you live in the US (or elsewhere), you must have the right to consult doctors who practice medicine the way you want to be treated. You must have the right to have complete privacy in your relationship with your doctor and your doctor must have the right to practice medicine without fear of secret accusations from unidentified parties which can destroy his/her career and ruin his/her reputation. It’s quite simple, really. In the US, your doctor and you need to be protected by the Constitution of the United States.

Health Freedom At the National Level

Protecting our doctors and health practitioners (the supply side of the equation), is intimately connected with the demand side of the equation. When consumers (and health care practitioners) cannot find out what the benefits of health care products are – which is what the FDA’s Guidance on Health Claims (and the closely related, FDA-driven Codex Health Claims text) is about, then we cannot make informed health decisions. That’s why it is so important to protect your right to learn what nutrients can do for you: Click here (http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizationsORG/healthfreedomusa/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=11754) to urge your Congressional members to support Ron Paul’s “Health Freedom Protection Act”, HR 2117, so the FDA cannot suppress valid, scientifically supported facts about supplements benefits.

Now that the public comment period has ended on the recent FDA Health Claims Guidance, the threat actually gets greater as the FDA prepares to issue its “Final Rule” on the Guidance. Only Congressional oversight, driven by public demand – yours – and legislation can bring the out-of-control FDA back under control.

FDA Running Amok

We need Congressional oversight of this run-away organization AND we need to separate food regulation from drug regulation! That’s the idea that the Natural Solutions Foundation has been sharing with the members of the FDA’s Congressional Oversight Committee Congressional offices during our visits to them. We’ll bring that idea back around next month when the Natural Solutions Foundation goes back to Washington for another round of Congressional meetings. If you would like to join the Natural Solutions Congressional Education team, let me know. Drop me a line at dr.laibow@gmail.com and put “Congressional Education” in the subject line.

Your emails to Congress and faxes to the FDA (which now officially longer accepts emails, probably because of our 200,000+ emails to them!) are ringing the Health Freedom Bell – and making quite a clanging in the halls of Washington.

In fact, without that public opinion chorus, Congress can’t hear us at all! But when you keep ringing that freedom bell, riding the “freedom mouse” and singing that freedom song they cannot ignore us. Click here (http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=11754) to make sure that we get the attention we deserve on this issue!

So Many Issues, So Little Time!

You know the feeling: issues to the right of us, issues to the left of us, an avalanche of issues. Every one of them deserves time, focus, understanding, funding, letters, petitions, etc. It’s enough to wear a body down. And, in fact, that is just what the other side is counting on. It’s just like insurance claims: the more times they get turned down, the more people stop submitting them so, even if they are valid, the insurance company has created a fatigue factor that saves it money. Persistence is required, and the determination NOT to be deprived of your rights just because the other side is counting on your eventual fatigue.

The parallel is striking. Yes, there are a lot of issues. Yes, this one requires persistence because we are in for the long haul or we are out of the game. But, as we see it here at the Natural Solutions Foundation, the stakes in this game are life, death and liberty. That’s worth staying on point for, as I know you agree.

And it’s worth being persistent for. I don’t remember Jefferson, Gandhi or Dr. King giving up because the other side kept coming at them. In fact, they, and we, take it as a sign that we are on the right path, just as we take the direct attacks by the Chairman of Codex, and the armed guard “special reception” we got at the last Codex meeting in July that we are on the right track.

Help us stay the course. Keep on emailing, circulating these Health Freedom Alerts, donating, holding community events to share this information and, most important, keep on keeping on. Health Freedom’s worth it!

UPDATE

“Murder by the Numbers: the Codex Agenda”

The Natural Solutions Foundation is working with powerful documentary makers to tell the real story behind Codex and what it means for all of us – world-wide preventable illness and death through a degraded and deadly food supply. You can see how Codex got there by viewing the new, updated version of “Nutricide: the DVD”. And now, we want to tell the rest of the story to the widest audience possible.

We discovered that this story is so hot – and so big – that our first film maker could not handle it! That’s pretty hot! Instead, we are working out the final details with some outstanding professional documentary makers who can handle the professional demands and the topic. More on that to follow.

In the meantime, we continue to need your help. Donate $100 or more and we will publicly thank you with an acknowledgment in the documentary. 25 people have already made that commitment. To fund this project fully we need 125 more folks to commit a minimum of $100 each. Are you ready to do that? Click here (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189) to make this documentary happen. Or, if you can give more, set up a matching grant: let me know that you will match donations of a certain amount and we will tell people about your dedication and generosity. Send an email to dr.laibow@gmail.com with “Matching Grant” as the subject and we’ll get it done!

Of course, we depend on your donations for our continued health freedom work. Click here (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189)to keep us moving forward. All donations are tax deductible. Won’t you please consider a recurring donation (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=189)?

If you indicate on our secure donation site that you want to support the Natural Solutions Foundation with a gift every month, it will be deducted from your credit card and you will receive a confirmation for your tax records each month as well.

Recurring donations help us budget our expenses, buy tickets in advance to save money, etc. Thanks in advance for your continuing support!

Citations:

*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confrontation_Clause http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution


Yours in health and freedom,

Dr. Rima


Rima R. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org